Everywhere I click or any magazine I read all I can see is Jordan Spieth being compared to Tiger Woods.
How every time he does something he’s getting closer to what the Tiger achieved.
But
personally I think it’s all a bit premature. Yes, he had a great year last
year but if you stop listening to the media for a second and actually really
compare the two on their first four years on tour Jordan is not in the same
league as Tiger.
I
think
it’s like comparing Manchester City to Manchester United. Insulting
really,
what United did over the past 20 years in football will be hard to
repeat and although City have some success recently they are no United.
If we
look at Jordan’s first four years on tour we have to say it's been
successful but did it grab the imagination of the World? Did it change the way
the sport was viewed by the general public? Has there been a queue of sponsors
looking to host tournaments? No, the tour just keeps on rolling.
If we
look at Tigers first four years we go WOW!
Simple as
that. He changed the game. Viewing figures exploded, kids all around the world
wanted to wear the red Nike T-Shirt. Established players had to look at their
games and totally rebuild just to be even in with a chance of going to the ball
that was the PGA tour with Tiger.
We could
compare medals straight away and we will get to that but the one stat that
jumps out to me over both of their first four years is "Cuts Missed":
Tiger: 1
Jordan:
14
That’s a
significant difference. Does it show when the going the gets tough Jordan just
folds or when his putting deserts him he struggles? Tiger was a machine, he was
so so good that his bad week would usually be a top 25.
This was
evident in the Majors. Tiger played in all 16 available to him, but Jordan
only got into 12. Again Tiger leads in cuts missed, zero, Jordan three.
Tigers worst performance tied 29th.
Okay what
about their medals. In other words how many wins have they notched up? Well
between them over this period they won a whopping 28 times. So if
Jordan is up there with Tiger he's surely won at least ten of these? Nope.
Here's the breakdown:
Jordan: 6
Tiger: 22
Okay, no one really cares about tour events
really anymore so what about the Majors. Between them again a spectacular seven.
Breakdown:
Tiger: 5
Jordan: 2
Yes,
but
Jordan could have won all four last year you might say . . . But what
about Tiger
at the same stage of his career? The year 2000, possibly the greatest
all four Major performance by any human being to date, three wins and a
fifth place
finish. That trumps Jordan’s 2015 all day long if you ask me. Historians
might
argue Ben Hogan winning the first three in 1953 matches Tiger but it’s
very
hard to compare as the game was so different.
2015 was
a sensational year for Master Spieth, as the great Peter Alliss would call him,
but when you go side by side with Tigers 2000 it doesn’t come close.
Tiger
played
20 times, won nine times and missed no cuts. That’s a win rate of 45pc,
one I don’t think we'll ever see again. Jordan played 25 times, won
five but missed four cuts. An incredible win rate of 20pc but without
repeating myself nowhere near as good as Tiger.
All-in-all
let’s hold off on the comparisons, I'm sure Jordan himself knows he’s
not even in the same category as the great one. But
only time will tell.....

No comments:
Post a Comment